Friday, May 7, 2010
Ethical Quandries
Whenever a reporter comes across a story that could be controversial, they have to ask themselves many questions. What is really happening here? Is the situation solvable in any other way? Is the reward for reporting this story worth the possible consequences it could have? These are just a few of the things that journalists have to think about when they find an instance in which there is no clear cut yes or no answer.
Ethics are an important value to have in life, no matter what your profession is, but it is especially important for journalists. This is because journalists are the ones who speak to the masses, they tell the community what is important to know and pay attention to. These decisions about useful information can have a major impact on the stories that the journalist decides, or doesn't decide to, cover and report on, and the engine that every reporter must consult in these situations is their individual code of ethics.
Thursday, May 6, 2010
Journalists’ Ethical Issues
Journalists face ethical issues on a daily basis. What is the right thing to do? What is the right thing to say? These are ethical issues that journalists face when going after the stories they want.
Some examples of problems journalists face in regards to ethics are the duty to their self, duty to their audience, duty to their employer, duty to their profession, and duty to their society. The journalist has to make all of these people happy and if they do not then a problem may arise.
Journalists try to limit the amount of harm done to a person as much as possible. This results in holding back information from articles or reports. For example, names of minors, crime victim names, or information not essentially related to particular news reports release of which might harm someone’s reputation.
Journalists face ethical dilemmas often and the best way to resolve them is to cause the least amount of harm possible to the person or persons and to do what you think is the right thing to do. “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.”
Tuesday, May 4, 2010
Journalists and Ethics
Everyday, when Journalists are on the front lines, and they need to make decisions, they are constantly facing the tough task of making sure they ethically obtain, report on and document stories correctly.
Even some of the most distinguished reporters face many ethical decisions everyday. They need to make the right decision that is right in correspondence to the situation.
For example there are many journalists that work as investigative reporters everyday who usually need to deicide if using techniques such as using a hidden camera or going undercover might violate other peoples rights.
As with situational ethics, the book, “Telling the Story,” talks about how many journalists might act within the slogan “the end justifies the means.” This basically means that there are some things that journalists might do that might be ethically wrong such as obtaining information in a way that might not be illegal but it would stir up the media world dramatically.
Finally, because journalists have the final say if what they are about to do is ethical, the decision ultimately lies within their hands. Whether they chose to violate their values or “burn bridges” to get the big story is purely their decision.
Monday, May 3, 2010
Journalists and Ethics
Journalists face the following ethical problems:
- Deceit- to lie, misrepresent, use a hidden camera or recorder, steal documents
- Conflicts of Interest- start out with no hidden agenda and no bias
- Friendship- a powerful conflict of interest
- Payola- never accept money for a story except by employer
- Freebies- never accept free gifts from people you cover because they always come with a price
- Checkbook Journalism- is it ethical to pay a source for an exclusive story?
- Participation in the News- let your employer know what organizations you are working for
- Advertising Pressure- work for an organization that clearly separates editorial and advertising
- Invasion of Privacy- figure out what you consider an invasion of privacy
- Withholding Information- would you withhold information from the news organization you work for
- Plagiarism- never use someone else’s work as your own
Journalists can solve Ethical issues by using Principled Reasoning, reflecting on your ethical principles that will help you decide on proper or moral ways to act.
Ethicists Clifford Christians, Kim Rotzoll, and Mark Fackler created a model for reasoning including these steps:
- Appraising the Situation
- Identifying Values
- Appealing to Ethical Principles
- Choosing Loyalties
Friday, April 30, 2010
Everyone is Right
Journalists and Ethics
Journalists and the first amendment
Pleading the First: What Journalists do every day
Freedom of Speech is important because without this, a major right in the United States would not be allowed, and that is that people have the right to say what is on their mind without having to worry about consequence from government. Journalists use this whenever they have to write an opinion or type up a controversial story, and the Amendment protects them from potential backlash that could come from people who may not want the writer to say such things.
Freedom of Press also greatly affects the media because it is in this sense that any outlet can have an equal chance to succeed in the market of mass media. Because the government cannot sanction one news source as "the official one", this allows free speech to prosper in the press, and lets each outlet adapt its own identity as a choice for where people can get their news. And this freedom to choose what people read is an essential part of what makes America the land that it is today.
How the first amendment effects journalism
If it wasn’t for the first amendment, it is likely that the whole profession of journalism could not exist. The first amendment to the constitution gives Americans the right to free speech, along with freedom of the press. By allowing Americans to have the freedom to speak and right about what they want, Americans can write stories that are investigative and critical of government without fear of punishment. The first amendment was strengthened by the New York Times vs Sullivan case, in which the jury decided that public figures are not entitled to the same privacy that everyday citizens are, and that means that newspapers do not have to be afraid when they print a story. It is our freedom in media that allows us to speak our minds about any issue, and as long as the piece isn’t slanderous or libel it is fit to be published. Without the first amendment, journalists would be too scared to write stories and there’d be no such profession.
Ethical Problems for Journalists
Another obstacle is freebies. If journalists accept free gifts from people, they cover, they may not stay objective, write stories that they might not write, and the public could see the reporter as someone who is suspected of or accepted freebies as an objective. In order to avoid any problems, journalists should not accept freebies at all.
The First Amendment and Journalists
However, journalists still have limitations. Journalists have to make sure they’re stories are accurate and true. There are three defenses against libel that exist. One is truth. Basically, you have to verify the information you published to make sure it’s true. The second is privilege, which applies to journalists who are covering any of the three branches of government. Finally there is fair comment and criticism, which means that journalists are protected as long as they don’t misstate any of the facts they base their comments on, and they don’t damage the information that they base their opinions on.
Thursday, April 29, 2010
Journalists and Their Ethics
Journalists must always be honest in getting a story, never being deceitful. Relying on such a tactic could result in a journalist losing not just his or her job, but his or her credibility and reputation as well.
Another ethical issue seen among journalists is conflict of interest. If a journalist has even the slightest connection to a story subject or issue, it can result in a story containing unprofessional emotions and a very strong bias-a big no-no in journalism. Conflicts of interest include friendship, which can often be the biggest obstacle when obtaining information, and taking payments from other than their employer.
Plagiarism is also a large issue in the journalism world. If a reporter is caught plagiarizing another person's work, he or she immediately loses all credibility and, more than likely, his or her job.
To avoid such ethical issues, journalists should follow the model of moral reasoning developed by Dr. Ralph Potter. This model, known as "The Potter Box," includes four elements: appraising the situation, identifying values, appealing to ethical principles, and choosing loyalties.
The First Amendment: What's it to journalists?
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights declares: "Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference, and impart information and ideas through any media regardless of frontiers" (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_Declaration_of_Human_Rights). This and the freedoms granted to us in the First Amendment allow journalists to essentially do their job.
With these rights, journalists are allowed to publish whatever they wish, on the grounds that no slanderous or libelous statements are ever made. Journalism happens to be the only profession that is protected under this Constitutional Amendment. Such protections are what allow journalists to post stories about the country's government and its officials, as well as stories about any other social and economic situations that may affect their own lives and the lives of their readers.
ethics of a journalist
Journalists rights
The First Amendment allows the right to freedom of speech, religion, petition, and most importantly (to journalists) freedom of the press. Free press gives journalists the right to release news information without intrusion by the government.
Journalists cannot be forced to publish any news and information they do not want to. Under the first amendment the US government cannot force them to.
Journalists are given the right to have free access to all sources of information and release that information if relating to public interest. Journalists also have the right to refuse any instruction if it violates the policy of their company. The rights American journalists have far surpass those in other countries, because of The First Amendment.
Ethics in Journalism
Journalists always try their hardest to create interesting, informative stories. But how far is too far?
There are many ethical problems when dealing with journalism.
Journalists often have to deal with something called a “conflict of interest.”
Journalists must try hard to not be bias and to see all sides of a problem. They can never choose sides in a story, which is best solved if the journalist has no relationship with the story or problem.
There is no laws about ethics in journalism, but it should be seem as an unwritten rule.
Solving ethical problems comes with practice. It requires reasoning by the journalist, as well as morals.
Journalists should focus on the facts of the story, rather than on how he or she feels about the story.
It is important that journalists are loyal and honest in their writing. A journalist is most likely to lose readers if they are not ethical and fair to all parties involved in the story.
The First Amendment
The First Amendment of the United States Constitution is very relevant to journalism.
The first amendment gives all Americans freedom of speech and freedom of the press.
This means that writers are free to write and publish what they wish, so long as they do not offend anyone in the process.
Journalism is one of the only professions in the United States that is protected by the Constitution.
Many countries around the world do not have as much freedom as the First Amendment gives to Americans.
The freedoms of the first amendment give American the chance to speak their minds, and the country a chance to develop.
If people were not able to say what they want, and stand up for what they believe in, there may still be inequality for women, slaves, and even child labor.
Clearly, the first amendment is closely related to journalism. It allows journalists to write whatever they want, and what they truly believe. Without this amendment, America would not be the country it is today.
Wednesday, April 28, 2010
freedom of press
The first Amendment allows journalist to say what they want and about who they want. The main limitation that comes into play is printing libel.
How do you define a "good" multimedia piece?
Most journalists spend a fair amount of their time crafting multimedia pieces as well as their traditional stories. These pieces contain, just as the name suggests, multiple forms of media as well as the written text.